Good video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddADeIsXrOw
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Monday, March 21, 2016
Cancer Fight foods
Vegi: broccoli family and garlic family
Fruit: cranberry, lemon
Cancer: Walnut, pecan & peanuts
antioxiant: walnut & pecan
Fruit: cranberry, lemon
Cancer: Walnut, pecan & peanuts
antioxiant: walnut & pecan
DENTAL BRACE CAUSE NICKEL TOXICITY
A number of teenagers and those in their twenties have reported to us that their health became worse after they wore dental braces for several years. Their hair mineral tests all revealed elevated levels of nickel, a very toxic metal.
Indeed, it appears that nickel alloys are being used in some dental braces, or perhaps for all of them. Nickel is inexpensive and malleable, qualities that make it ideal for dental wires and perhaps other dental uses.
The problem is much worse in anyone who does not eat a diet high in cooked vegetables and high quality foods. Unfortunately, this describes most teenagers and those in their twenties. Enough of the vital minerals will antagonize or oppose some of the nickel, but if the diet is low in physiological minerals, the body will absorb more nickel from the environment.
NICKEL, AN EXTREMELY TOXIC METAL
Nickel is unfortunately an extremely toxic metal that has no business being anywhere near the body. It is associated with feelings of anger, rage, depression and even suicidal thoughts. It can also affect the kidneys, the lungs, digestion and other body functions. Even small amounts of nickel in the body can be extremely toxic.
Other possible sources of nickel include:
- wearing nickel-plated jewelry, or costume jewelry. Nickel plating looks like silver, so jewelry is often made this way.
- rooibos tea, also called red tea.
- consuming hydrogenated oils found in commercial peanut butter, all margarines, Crisco, vegetable shortening, candies and many refined food products.
- smoking cigarettes.
- handling or breathing fumes of metal, especially steel, which contains nickel. Occupations such as metal-working, welding, construction, electrical work and other may be provide sources of nickel.
WHAT TO DO IF YOU HAVE ELEVATED NICKEL
A nutritional balancing program will remove nickel from the body in all cases. In my experience, this is the best method to remove it. I do not recommend chelation therapy at all, as it always removes some vital minerals along with the toxic ones.
Also, reduce your exposure to nickel by removing braces, avoiding hydrogenated oils and cigarettes, and do not wear nickel-plated jewelry if possible. If you must wear it, then take off the jewelry and coat it with clear polyurethane varnish on any area that will touch your skin. Revarnish it once a year or so, as the varnish will wear off.
Indeed, it appears that nickel alloys are being used in some dental braces, or perhaps for all of them. Nickel is inexpensive and malleable, qualities that make it ideal for dental wires and perhaps other dental uses.
The problem is much worse in anyone who does not eat a diet high in cooked vegetables and high quality foods. Unfortunately, this describes most teenagers and those in their twenties. Enough of the vital minerals will antagonize or oppose some of the nickel, but if the diet is low in physiological minerals, the body will absorb more nickel from the environment.
NICKEL, AN EXTREMELY TOXIC METAL
Nickel is unfortunately an extremely toxic metal that has no business being anywhere near the body. It is associated with feelings of anger, rage, depression and even suicidal thoughts. It can also affect the kidneys, the lungs, digestion and other body functions. Even small amounts of nickel in the body can be extremely toxic.
Other possible sources of nickel include:
- wearing nickel-plated jewelry, or costume jewelry. Nickel plating looks like silver, so jewelry is often made this way.
- rooibos tea, also called red tea.
- consuming hydrogenated oils found in commercial peanut butter, all margarines, Crisco, vegetable shortening, candies and many refined food products.
- smoking cigarettes.
- handling or breathing fumes of metal, especially steel, which contains nickel. Occupations such as metal-working, welding, construction, electrical work and other may be provide sources of nickel.
WHAT TO DO IF YOU HAVE ELEVATED NICKEL
A nutritional balancing program will remove nickel from the body in all cases. In my experience, this is the best method to remove it. I do not recommend chelation therapy at all, as it always removes some vital minerals along with the toxic ones.
Also, reduce your exposure to nickel by removing braces, avoiding hydrogenated oils and cigarettes, and do not wear nickel-plated jewelry if possible. If you must wear it, then take off the jewelry and coat it with clear polyurethane varnish on any area that will touch your skin. Revarnish it once a year or so, as the varnish will wear off.
Friday, March 11, 2016
Cancertutor.com Leukemia 山竹汁，noli juice
CAUTION:Melatonin should NOT be used by people with leukemia, Hodgkins disease, lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Melatonin’s beneficial effect on immunity could worsen immune system cancers. Calcium supplements should also be taken with care to avoid hypercalcemia.
Leukemia and MDS are very similar types of cancer. Apparently in both cases microbes in the blood marrow are able to get inside of immature cells and prevent them from becoming mature (i.e. differentiated). Only leukemia will be discussed, but what is said about leukemia applies to MDS.
Certain types of alternative cancer treatments would have no affect on leukemia because they do not apply. For example,shark cartilage is primarily designed to stop the growth of tumors, which usually does not apply to leukemia. The Rath Cellular Solution is designed to work with the connective tissue, which also does not apply to leukemia. And there are other alternative treatments that do not apply.
Recommended Protocol – The Cellect-Budwig Protocol, High RF Frequency Device and Fucoidan
The recommended treatment for this type of cancer is three protocols (in this order if you cannot afford all 3):
1) The Cellect-Budwig,
2) Fucoidan (not the real name of the product),
3) A High RF Frequency Device
1) The Cellect-Budwig,
2) Fucoidan (not the real name of the product),
3) A High RF Frequency Device
The Cellect-Budwig is a major natural medicine cancer treatment. It can be used for any type of cancer as it has the alkalinity of cesium chloride along with many other items to deal with cancer, weak cells, etc.
It also comes with expert support from Mike Vrentas, who provides a two-hour consultation for about $250.
Cellect-Budwig Protocol
Cellect-Budwig Protocol
Fucoidan
Fucoidan, which is an optional treatment, actually kills cancer cells but lacks the power of the Cellect-Budwig to work quickly.
We only recommend one brand of Fucoidan because this company owns the key patents for the extraction of fucoidan. Here is an article on this protocol:
Fucoidan
Fucoidan
Mangosteen juice or Noni juice can be used as a substitute for Fucoidan. See below.
The High RF Frequency Device
For leukemia aHigh RF Frequency Protocol – Plasma is REQUIRED as it can get to any cancer cell in the body, even when the bloodstream does not get to the cancer cells!!! It is commonly used with the Cellect-Budwig.
There are very specific instructions for cancer which do not automatically come with the device but they do come from the vendor of the High RF Frequency Device which we recommend.
The High RF Frequency Protocol – Plasma is recommended because it can be used while the patient sleeps as well as the daytime. But either device will be very beneficial for dealing with leukemia.
Other Treatments To Consider (Supplemental Treatments Only)
Noni Juice
As I mention in my Noni Juice article, not all Noni Juices are the same. There are powerful testimonials for Noni Juice in treating leukemia. Pain is another thing which is improved by Noni Juice. In short, Noni Juice would clearly help the treatment.
Mangosteen is another natural drink that can fight cancer, but we do not have a recommended vendor. Just use Google to find a good brand.
Raw Food Diet
In discussing the Raw Food diet, it is beta carotene that is most often talked about. Beta carotene is specifically mentioned as a major killer of leukemia cells. While beta carotene is rarely used by itself, it is clear that it is a major contributor, if not the main contributor, of many treatment plans. Of course raw carrot juice should be the major source of beta carotene.
Raw Food Diet
Raw Food Diet
Back-Up Plan
If the patient cannot afford the Cellect-Budwig, or for any other reason chooses not to use it, the back-up protocol is the Dirt Cheap Protocol. Do not be deceived by its name, the Dirt Cheap Protocol is the most commonly used protocol on this website. Like the Cellect-Budwig, it has an outstanding success rate against cancer.
Monday, March 7, 2016
Nutrition review
Give this background, even if you accept the dietary recommendations Dr. Block, even with their flaws, it is nearly certain that your diet will improve dramatically and health benefits will flow from that single decision. His advice is mostly very, very good. But it does have some errors. If you can correct those errors, you can get the full benefits he intends for you to get. I hope in a future revision of this book, the errors are corrected. From reading this, I have the impression that Dr. Block truly cares about people with cancer and thus will make the needed corrections.
Another impression I got is the book is somewhat of an advertorial for the treatment center Dr. Block is part of. Only somewhat, though. Of course, there's the subtitle giving this impression. But, the tone isn't advertorial and the book really isn't about the Block Center. It's about what the Block Center is doing and why it works.
I think, given the complexity of the topic, Dr. Block is trying to speak from experience. As he doesn't work at other centers, that leaves using this one as the basis. He may also feel that it's not his place to tell other cancer care providers how to do their jobs. So, his position is, "Here's what we are doing and you can see it works measurably better than non-integrated approaches. Please consider this."
The errors I can identify are related to either nutrition or exercise. I'm providing a complete list, so you can print out this review and use it as an erratum to the book.
Errors: Nutrition
Nutrition is a subject that most doctors know very poorly and in which what little they do know is often incorrect. I point that out so the reader understands Dr. Block has actually done a pretty decent job here. Lots of good advice, but some errors.
Fish. He repeatedly recommends eating fish and taking fish oil. Aside from the moral imperative to reduce the demand for human consumption of fish (read about fish depletion, some time), there is the fact that fish flesh contains high concentrations of various toxins. If you're sick, you should avoid fish rather than eat more of it.
Egg yolk. He is under the impression that egg yolks are bad. The opposite is true. Eating the whole egg is much healthier than tossing away half of the egg. Yolks contain some great nutrients, including vitamin D. Read about vitamin D, and you see it reaches into just about every bodily system. It's arguably the most important of the vitamins. Why throw it away?
Dr. Block recommends eggs that come from chickens that have Omega 3 added to their feed. This is also wrong. What you want are eggs that come from chickens that aren't on chicken feed (regardless of what's added). In CAFOs (read about those), chickens are routinely fed pig poop, ground chicken, and chicken poop in addition to the non-natural grains. That is what commercial chicken feed is, and adding Omega 3 to it doesn't make for healthy, good-tasting eggs.
Free range chickens or those raised on smaller farms (e.g., Amish) naturally produce eggs high in Omega 3. To test if you have good eggs, check the shell. A good egg has a tough shell that you must whack hard to crack open. The cheap, mass-produced eggs have thin, fragile shells (the chickens that lay them also have fragile skeletons).
Whey protein. This is a short molecule protein that the gut absorbs rapidly. Bodybuilders consume it right after very hard workouts, and the muscles uptake it quickly. But consume it outside that "depleted muscle window" and most of it just turns to fat. This is why there are protein blends. There are alternative proteins also, such as buckwheat and hemp, that do not come from dairy products. Dr. Block rails against dairy constantly in this book, yet a cornerstone of his dietary advice is whey--a dairy product.
Fruit juice. He actually recommends this, so my recommendation to him is to ask an endocrinologist to explain why fruit juice is not fit for human consumption. Yes, there is some upside to fruit juice consumption. But the downside is comparatively so immense that the question of whether to drink it isn't open for debate. The effects include insulin spiking, and Dr. Block devotes considerable space in this book to the subject of moderating insulin (which he says cancers require for metastasizing). You can't moderate insulin and spike it; these are mutually exclusive.
Kale. If you grow this in soil enriched with crumbled eggshells and coffee grounds, you get a dark, calcium-rich plant that contains all of the nutrients you need for absorbing calcium. The calcium chart Dr. Block includes in the book does not account for bioavailability or other factors that determine how much of the calcium you can use from a given source. On the one hand, Dr. Block advises to reduce calcium intake and on the other he advises to eat more kale. I'm not sure how to resolve this conflict, but I would lean toward the latter.
On page 84, he rates eggplant as "OK for Daily Use" but not "OK for Every Meal." I think he's referring to breaded/fried eggplant. I grow eggplant in rich soil and cut it up into cubes that I add, raw, to my veggies and soups. Eggplant is an anti-oxidant powerhouse, particularly in relation to colon cancer. Eggplant is OK for Every Meal.
Also on page 84, he recommends eating corn. No, no, and no. On page 85, he calls corn a vegetable. It is not. Corn is a grain, and it is the one grain that has been cultivated for over 5,000 years to be high in sugar and less nutrient-dense. Consequently, the typical corn product is not fit for animals (including humans) to eat. That includes sweet corn. Canned corn adds more toxicity to the mix.
The exception with corn is popcorn. Popcorn has a very hard kernel and is low in sugar. You must heat it and burst the kernel to eat it. Popcorn with garlic and cayenne pepper on it is healthy and a good fat loss food (I'm at 6.3% body fat as I write this, and have been eating this almost daily for the past month and a half), provided you have a moderate amount, pop it in olive oil (or some other safe oil, not the microwave stuff), and eat it with beans to get a nearly complete protein profile.
Highly glycemic grains. Millet is highly glycemic. It will spike your insulin. This, and some other grain recommendations from Dr. Block, are to be avoided.
On page 86, Dr. Block advises eating crackers. These are typically made with multiple toxins, including hydrogenated oil, refined wheat flour (which is highly glycemic), and corn syrup. If you choose to buy anything that comes in a box or can, read the label very carefully before putting it in your shopping cart. If you are eating out, just assume the crackers are toxic and don't eat them.
On page 94, he recommends raisins. In other places, he recommends other dried fruits. These are all highly glycemic. You can eat these in tiny amounts with a fat or protein.
On page 94, he recommends pineapple. This particular fruit has been bred to be high in sugar. It's sweet. It's highly glycemic. Canned pineapple adds extra toxicity over fresh. Fresh pineapple may be OK if eaten in small amounts along with something to blunt the glycemic effect, but why take the risk? There are plenty of other fruits to choose from.
On page 99, he recommends decaf coffee and doesn't elaborate on what this means. Typically, decaf coffee can also be called "formaldehyde enriched." Formaldehyde is a potent carcinogen. If you put decaf grounds on garden plants, they usually will die. That said, there is a caffeine-reduction process that doesn't use formaldehyde. The actual plant has been bred to produce less caffeine. As caffeine is normally harmless unless taken in huge quantities and formaldehyde is toxic even in low amounts, I think I'd stick with regular coffee.
On page 354, he recommends canola oil but says to avoid safflower oil. I disagree with this. Canola oil isn't a natural oil, and it has some significant downsides. I use safflower oil regularly.
He disses peanut butter and in one spot mentions commercial peanut butter. Peanut butter is very healthy, but look on the label to ensure it's not commercial peanut butter. That will be true if the ingredients are listed as "Peanuts" or "Peanuts and salt." If there is anything else on that label, don't buy the peanut butter. Also remember that peanut butter is farily calorie dense. A little goes a long way.
Errors: Exercise
On page 169, Dr. Block correctly identifies the need for good posture. Yet, few people have anything remotely close. Bodybuilders, gymnasts, and serious martial artists are among the few who are conscious of their posture all the time. The solution for most people is a chiropractor. Yet, Dr. Block mentions chiropractic only once in passing as a "you might want to" thing. Actually, chiropractic should be a core aspect of your physical fitness program.
Dr. Block discusses working your core. This is correct. The typical gym rat never does this. Properly done front squats work the core very well, which is why they are so exhausting. The core goes beyond what Dr. Block describes. It's not just the abs, but the whole abdominal cavity, including the pelvic floor. There's a whole body of literature about this.
Dr. Block gives a reason that situps are not a good exercise. He's correct that they aren't but the reason is they work mostly the hip flexors and actually work against good posture. A great ab exercise is the properly done front squat. Hanging leg raises are also good. These are my ab exercises, and I have very striking abs (my photo is at supplecity.com).
Dr. Block provides a great tip at the bottom of page 180. He talks about interval training, and he is spot on. So, not an error here. The error is he doesn't carry this through the rest of the book. Interval training is high intensity exercise, and most of his recommendations are for moderate or low intensity exercise--the kind that produces minimal results. There is extensive literature on why high intensity exercise has profound effects and other kinds of exercise have, at best, moderate benefits.
On page 207, he recommends endurance training to "lose weight" (by which he means lose fat). Wrong. This kind of training depresses testosterone (which signals the body to burn fat) and raises cortisol (which signals the body to store fat). There is extensive literature on this. You can also look at sprinters and notice their lean, strong physiques and compare them to marathoners whose layer of body fat deprives them of good muscle definition.
Also, go back to Dr. Block's own discussion of interval training. Endurance training is the opposite. While it will burn calories during the exercise, calorie burning stops shortly after and also the hormonal environment that it leaves is conducive to fat storage rather than fat burning.
On page 211, he says to get a trainer so you learn how to exercise without injuring your muscles. Very few people injure their muscles in weight training, as they don't train with intensity. The real problem is they don't have a good program in place and end up creating muscle imbalances. For example, they will do leg presses and not hamstring curls. This creates a muscle imbalance that eventually causes back pain and other problems. I don't do leg presses. Front squats done properly will work the entire leg and eliminate muscle imbalances. A qualified trainer can coach you on how to do this exercise properly. It's not intuitive.
Conclusion
With all of the above errors, is the book one to avoid? No. It's a great book. Even if you follow it to the tee and accept the errors as sound advice, you will be far better off than the typical American who has a bad diet, bad posture, and poorly planned fitness program (if any). Further, the book goes beyond these areas to provide what I presume to be excellent advice. But consult an endocrinologist and a fitness trainer who personally does front squats and looks very fit, so you can use what's good in here without using what's bad. Or, just print out this review as an erratum and you're good to go.
What's inside
This book consists of 556 pages. It has 29 chapters and an epilogue. It also has an index and three pages about the Block Center for Integrative Cancer Treatment. Notice, that is only three pages. This is one reason why I say this book really isn't an advertorial for the Block Center.
Unfortunately, this book does not list sources or have a bibliography. There are some references in the text, and the author uses a large number of anecdotes.
反面意见，西医不能完全放弃
My mom bought this book, along with every available alternative cancer treatment book she could get her hands on. She was diagnosed with Stage 1 Breast Cancer and believed she could cure her cancer with alternative treatments. She had several alternative doctors she worked with and forego the advice of her regular doctor and her oncologist. She even bought this book for my sister and I. I have so many regrets today. I told her I personally would take the advice of a well known oncologist over someone selling a product/ book that didn't have the credentials to determine her treatment but that was all I said. I told her whatever decision she made I would support. She died this past February a week after turning 59. She had cut out all sugar, no meat, ate organic, exercised, took IV supplements and alternative treatments at a clinic, acupuncture, and more. She tried ceseem (sp?), protocel, and cur cumin IV and more. She did everything she could think of and was guided to do and nothing worked for her. She died because she didn't do radiation, because she didn't do chemo and more importantly, she died because of the cancer. People floor me when they say that chemo kills. Chemo is trying to kill the cancer and yes, it may not work, but alternative medicine doesn't work all the time either. On another note, my step mom had breast cancer over 20 years ago. She had a mastectomy and chemo. Guess what, she is still alive. My husband's aunt has breast cancer... again over 15 years ago, she had a lumpectomy and chemo, and she is still alive. My sister's friend had a mastectomy and is on medicine, she is still alive. My mom didn't make it three years and suffered very badly in the end. Chemo may make you suffer... but not doing chemo may also make you suffer. My mom suffered kidney failure, large, open wounds where the cancer ate through her skin, weakness and weight loss. She suffered many months. So, go ahead and buy this book. But beware. It didn't work for my mom. She was optimistic to the end too. (By the way, she was very religious..for those of you who will say she wasn't "saved" because she didn't have faith...couldn't be further from the truth.)
Beating Cancer with Nutrition, book with CD
I totally agree with your common sense comments! I was diagnosed with stage 4 Colon cancer, which spread to my lungs and liver. I was told to plan my funeral and that I had 12 months at the most to live. This book gave me common sense advice about nutritional supplements and natural foods & has changed my life. I'm approaching my 5 year anniversary of my diagnosis, I believe that chemo has a better chance of killing you and not curing you. The chemo has left me with neuropathy of the feet and hands. Nausea is considered "normal" I love this book! It makes me angry that so many people out there are willing to fleece those unfortunates with cancer and literally steal their money with false cures, products & promises. I am certain that eating natural foods and supplements has given me more time. I'm not afraid to die but I am happy for each day. Live each day as if you "DON'T have cancer. Take charge of your life, you will be surprised what a magnificent machine our bodies are with positive attitudes
Sunday, March 6, 2016
反对 The cure for all cancer的意见
In my oncology practice, patients will often bring me articles or books on "alternative" medical therapies. I try to approach all of them with an open mind. One of the best chemotherapy agents ever developed is derived from the bark of the Pacific Yew tree. You never know where the next advance in medicine will come from. I tell my patients that I divide alternative medicines into three categories: known to help, known to harm, and not enough evidence to say one way or the other.
When I was handed this book by a patient, I was immediately worried by the grandiose title. Really, ALL cancer? From melanoma of the skin to metastatic breast cancer? As I read the book, I was initially shocked and eventually appalled by the recommendations. The advice that was given would, if followed, clearly result in harm and potentially death to cancer patients. Not only does Hulda Clark tout her own ridiculous theories on the origins of the disease, she encourages patients to follow her advice and to avoid therapies of proven benefit. I could not believe my eyes.
Curious (and not a little angry), I checked on Quackwatch, a website dedicated to debunking medical frauds. Sure enough, Hulda Clark has an entire section devoted to her. Before you buy one of her books, at least read what others have had to say. Understand that, for her to be correct, literally every physician and nurse you have every met would have to be part of a conspiracy to hide this truth. If a few zaps of electricity could cure cancer, then literally every drug company, every family doctor, every Nobel prize winner for the past half-century would need to be in on the lie. Or, if that seems a bit much, it could be the Hulda Clark is a quack. Ask yourself which seems more likely.
Now, I have no doubt that this review will be unpopular. When a person is diagnosed with a terminal illness, there is a tendency to latch on to and believe anyone who offers hope. Emotions like "what have I got to lose" are common. Here I am destroying that hope. I'm sure that some people who read this will be angry and look to dismiss what I write. All I can say is that I (unlike Hulda Clark) have nothing to gain from giving this advice (well, other than the satisfaction of calling out Hulda Clark). Before you cry "medical industrial complex" or something like that, my practice is in a military clinic. I make the same salary whether my patients follow my advice or hers. Sometimes, the simplest explanations are correct. I'm just a doctor who saw one of his patients being taken advantage of during a vulnerable time in her life. I hope this modest contribution can keep this from happening to others.
When I was handed this book by a patient, I was immediately worried by the grandiose title. Really, ALL cancer? From melanoma of the skin to metastatic breast cancer? As I read the book, I was initially shocked and eventually appalled by the recommendations. The advice that was given would, if followed, clearly result in harm and potentially death to cancer patients. Not only does Hulda Clark tout her own ridiculous theories on the origins of the disease, she encourages patients to follow her advice and to avoid therapies of proven benefit. I could not believe my eyes.
Curious (and not a little angry), I checked on Quackwatch, a website dedicated to debunking medical frauds. Sure enough, Hulda Clark has an entire section devoted to her. Before you buy one of her books, at least read what others have had to say. Understand that, for her to be correct, literally every physician and nurse you have every met would have to be part of a conspiracy to hide this truth. If a few zaps of electricity could cure cancer, then literally every drug company, every family doctor, every Nobel prize winner for the past half-century would need to be in on the lie. Or, if that seems a bit much, it could be the Hulda Clark is a quack. Ask yourself which seems more likely.
Now, I have no doubt that this review will be unpopular. When a person is diagnosed with a terminal illness, there is a tendency to latch on to and believe anyone who offers hope. Emotions like "what have I got to lose" are common. Here I am destroying that hope. I'm sure that some people who read this will be angry and look to dismiss what I write. All I can say is that I (unlike Hulda Clark) have nothing to gain from giving this advice (well, other than the satisfaction of calling out Hulda Clark). Before you cry "medical industrial complex" or something like that, my practice is in a military clinic. I make the same salary whether my patients follow my advice or hers. Sometimes, the simplest explanations are correct. I'm just a doctor who saw one of his patients being taken advantage of during a vulnerable time in her life. I hope this modest contribution can keep this from happening to others.
Tons of information for AML
http://www.earthclinic.com/cures/leukemia.html#aml
Lee, I was diagnosed w/ AML in 1997, refused bone marrow transplant, and miraculously survived. I didn't take any H2O2 but did take lots of Vit-C. The H2O2 has the potential to be a game changer in your condition, but since you may not get the first-hand response you requested, fallow the rule "start low and go slow" (which is the recommended method). If you don't get positive results after having reached the maximum dose and perhaps a week or two beyond, drop it and adopt a new protocol. The health advocate Jon Barron of Baseline For Healthrecommends first buffering/alkalizing prior to H2O2 as the oxygen levels of a well buffered body are many more times higher than not. You can use oral routes for this or (and what I would recommend in your acute condition) take whole body hot baths w/ added baking soda & epsom salts (also is very good detoxifier).
Lee, I was diagnosed w/ AML in 1997, refused bone marrow transplant, and miraculously survived. I didn't take any H2O2 but did take lots of Vit-C. The H2O2 has the potential to be a game changer in your condition, but since you may not get the first-hand response you requested, fallow the rule "start low and go slow" (which is the recommended method). If you don't get positive results after having reached the maximum dose and perhaps a week or two beyond, drop it and adopt a new protocol. The health advocate Jon Barron of Baseline For Healthrecommends first buffering/alkalizing prior to H2O2 as the oxygen levels of a well buffered body are many more times higher than not. You can use oral routes for this or (and what I would recommend in your acute condition) take whole body hot baths w/ added baking soda & epsom salts (also is very good detoxifier).
I would also recommend Milk Thistle Seed Extract for liver support as the bone marrow will depress w/ a toxic liver. For immune support do the Thymus recommends that I posted a few days ago under a lupus heading somewhere. This will really help your immune system. Also for the immune system and bone marrow support is the herb Astragalus Root. If you are running a temp it is advised to not use as it will raise temp about 1 or 2 degrees.
Hope this helps and good luck. Report your results.
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)